@InCollection{MacedoAlSaRuSoRoJś:2014:HoSpDy,
author = "Macedo, Rodrigo de Campos and Almeida, Cl{\'a}udia Maria de and
Santos, Jo{\~a}o Roberto dos and Rudorff, Bernardo Friedrich
Theodor and Soares-Filho, Britaldo Silveira and Rodrigues, Hermann
Oliveira and J{\'u}nior, Wilson Cabral de Sousa",
title = "Economic Impact Assessment of Silting-up and Erosion Processes:
How Spatial Dynamic Models Coupled with Environmental Valuation
Models Can Contribute to Sustainable Practices in Sugarcane
Farming",
booktitle = "Sugarcane: Production, Consumption and Agricultural Management
Systems",
year = "2014",
editor = "Publishers, Nova Science",
pages = "61--89",
keywords = "silting-up, economic valuation, environmental impact, payment for
ecosystem services.",
abstract = "This chapter approaches the economic valuation of environmental
impacts related to soil erosion and silting-up of water streams,
designed to allow the transfer of recovery costs to a policy of
payment for ecosystem services. The aim of this study is to
evaluate the contribution of silting-up mitigation to funding the
environmental recovery of riparian areas found in sugarcane farms.
The city selected for study is Arealva, located in the
Central-West region of S{\~a}o Paulo State, Southeast of Brazil.
Spatial dynamic models were conceived to simulate past land
cover/land use changes (2005-2010) and future landscape scenarios
(2010-2020) in the study area. The main observed changes that took
place from 2005 to 2010 were: sugarcane expansion (6,012.71ha
(49.68%)), mostly extending over grazing lands, and deforestation
(3,107.16ha (22.33%)), predominantly converted into pastures.
Three sets of scenarios were defined: i) stationary scenarios, in
which the transition rates observed in former years were held
constant (business as usual); ii) nonstationary scenarios with a
partial recovery of environmentally protected areas along
riversides (70% by 2015), and; iii) non-stationary scenarios with
a full recovery of environmentally protected areas along
riversides (100% by 2015). The regarded impacts are dependent on
the estimated amount of lost soil, assessed by means of the
Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE). We also estimated the
sediment accumulation rate in order to calculate siltation. The
envisaged scenarios for environmental recovery can reduce
environmental impacts up to 16% (US\$41,479.29 to US\$56,789.40)
yearly. The riparian and alike vulnerable areas (prone to erosion
and silting-up) can be recovered through a financing mechanism,
relying either on water use charging or even on a taxation
strategy implicitly considering the payment for ecosystem
services. The silting mitigation would approximately contribute
with US\$13.83 to US\$18.94 ha-1.year-1. In this way, sugarcane
farms would have a financial incentive to restore and maintain the
environmentally protected areas within their domain, reducing the
environmental impacts related to silting-up processes.",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)}",
isbn = "9781633216990 and 9781611223569",
label = "self-archiving-INPE-MCTI-GOV-BR",
language = "en",
targetfile = "Macedo et al_Capitulo de Livro Internacional_NOVA Publishers.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "27 abr. 2024"
}